Cardinal jeered at Australia court over sex offences

 Cardinal George Pell

Cardinal George Pell

Sydney — Cardinal George Pell, the most senior Catholic official to face sex offence charges, was jeered by protesters as he made a court appearance in his native Australia yesterday in a case that has rocked the Vatican and placed scrutiny on the pope’s stance against abusive clergy.

Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic and Pope Francis’ top financial adviser, Pell entered the Melbourne Magistrate’s Court flanked by police and media as a small group of placard-waving protesters yelled from the sidewalk. He did not react to the hecklers.

The 20-minute hearing focused on planning for the committal hearing starting March 5 that will determine whether he goes to trial. As many as 50 witnesses could be called for that proceeding, expected to last a month.

Pell, who remained silent throughout, has been charged with multiple offences involving multiple complainants. The exact detail and nature of the charges have not been disclosed to the public, though police have described them as “historical” sexual assault offences, meaning they are alleged to have occurred years ago.

Pell through his lawyer has vowed to fight the charges. The 76-year-old cardinal has taken leave from his position as Vatican treasurer to return to Australia and defend himself. He has not been required to enter a plea in court, though his attorney said at his first court appearance in July that Pell intended to plead not guilty.

Pell’s attorney, Robert Richter, told yesterday’s hearing at least one of the allegations could not have happened.

“We propose to demonstrate to Your Honour that what was alleged was impossible,” Richter told magistrate Belinda Wallington.

Yesterday’s brief hearing centred on which witnesses would be cross-examined at the committal hearing, and touched on a factor likely to feature prominently in the case – the memories of witnesses speaking about incidents alleged to have occurred up to several decades ago.

Richter pointed out one witness had given police a “vague” statement. Wallington noted the man was age 11 at the time.

“We’re dealing with historical events. Memory’s not static,” Wallington said.

The magistrate refused Pell’s lawyers permission to cross-examine five witnesses they had hoped to question, but granted permission for them to cross-examine dozens of others at the committal hearing, saying it was appropriate to allow those witnesses’ memories to be “further explored”.

Outside the court, protester Helen Dawson told Melbourne’s Herald-Sun newspaper that although brief, today’s court appearance by Pell was very significant. “This trial is a very important display that the days of special privileges for high-ranking religious officials are finished and gone,” she said.

After years of alleged cover-ups and silence from the church over its paedophilia scandal, abuse survivors and their advocates have hailed the prosecution of Pell as a monumental shift in the way society is responding to the crisis. The case places both the cardinal and Pope Francis in potentially perilous territory. For Pell, the charges are a threat to his freedom, his reputation and his career.

For Francis, they are a threat to his credibility, given he famously promised a “zero tolerance” policy for sex abuse in the church. Advocates for abuse victims have long railed against Francis’ decision to appoint Pell to his high-ranking position in the first place.

 

Pin It