A wave of violence hours after Nigeria’s government announced a truce with Boko Haram,raised doubt yesterday about whether more than 200 schoolgirls kidnapped by the Islamist militants, will really be released, deflating the new hopes of their parents.
Nigeria’s armed forces chief, Air Chief Marshal Alex Badeh, announced the ceasefire on Friday, to enable the release of the girls, who were abducted from the remote northeastern village of Chibok in April.
But Boko Haram has not confirmed the truce and there have been at least five attacks since – blamed by security sources on the insurgents – that have killed dozens. Talks were scheduled to continue in neighbouring Chad today.
“We were jubilating. We’d every reason to be happy . . . but since then the ceasefire has been broken in quite a number of places already,” Lawan Abana, a parent of one of the missing girls, said by telephone.
He added that there were doubts about the credentials of the reported Boko Haram negotiator Danladi Ahmadu, who was unheard of before. “Can we trust him that he can deliver on this promise of releasing the girls, when he has not delivered on the promise of the ceasefire?” Abana asked.
The government says the attacks may not have been Boko Haram’s, but one of several criminal groups exploiting the chaos of its insurgency. Analysts point out that Boko Haram is anyway, heavily factionalised, so what matters is whether the faction the government is talking to, has control over the girls’ fate.
“Boko Haram is deeply fractured. The Nigerian government has had a . . . difficult time identifying a Boko Haram representative who could make compromises, and guarantee the entire group will observe them,” risk consultancy, Stratfor said in a note.
“It’s quite possible that Abuja has reached an agreement with a legitimate representative of a specific cell . . . that holds the kidnapped schoolgirls captive,” it said on Saturday.
Boko Haram, whose name translates roughly as “Western education is sinful”, has massacred thousands in a battle to carve an Islamic state out of religiously mixed Nigeria.
Its only known method of conveying messages is via videotaped speeches by a man claiming to be Abubakar Shekau, its leader whom the military last year said it had killed.
Ahmed Salkida, a Nigerian journalist who was once close to Boko Haram and shared a jail cell with its founder Mohammed Yusuf in 2009, tweeted that whoever Ahmadu is, he isn’t a member of Boko Haram’s senior “Shura council” nor does “he speak for them, as far as I know”.
A swift release of the girls would bode well for the campaign of President Goodluck Jonathan for February 2015 elections. Jonathan has faced relentless criticism for failing to protect civilians in the northeast or resolve the Chibok girls crisis.
Boko Haram is regarded as the worst threat to the future of Nigeria, Africa’s biggest economy and oil producer.
Jonathan is expected to declare he is running for a second elected term soon, and the opposition is keen not to allow him to capitalize on efforts to free the girls.
“It’s interesting, the timing comes as Jonathan is about to announce he wants to run for a second term. Is it by sheer coincidence?” the spokesman for the main All Progressives Congress, Lai Mohammed, said by telephone.
But Nigeria’s military has scored some successes against Boko Haram over the past two weeks, wresting back some territory near the northeast border with Cameroon.
Oby Ezekwesil, whose “Bring back our girls” campaign has highlighted daily protests in Abuja, told Reuters she was “cautiously optimistic, but extremely anxious, not knowing what the details of this ceasefire really are.
“If it happens, it would be the best news in decades.” — AFP